ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
An update on the Elsevier situation: Now Harvard University admits they can't afford journal subscriptions svpow.com/2012/04/23/harvards-… , and urges their professors to move to open-access journals. The Department of Mathematics at the Technical University of Munich just voted to CANCEL all subscriptions to Elsevier journals:
Because of unsustainable subscription prices and conditions, the board of directors of the mathematics department has voted to cancel all of its subscriptions to Elsevier journals by 2013. svpow.com/2012/05/04/they-said…
To quote Dr. Mike Taylor of SV-POW:
Publishers who are paying attention will surely start to realise that they have pushed their exploitative prices too far, and that they don't hold libraries in a steely grip any more. I wonder how this will play into investment advice regarding Elsevier?
This isn't the kind of problem that can be fixed by hiring a PR person. I've argued this before, but if Elsevier are going to survive, they'll need to be much clearer in the their communications, eliminate practices that alienate authors, and ultimately change their business model entirely.
This is good news indeed, but it can't come soon enough. Some of the newest sauropod papers just published are (unwisely) STILL being submitted by their authors in paywalled journals of Elsevier's ilk, such as Taylor & Francis, and Wiley. One wonders how many academics are truly paying attention to the long-overdue changing times, after SV-POW (not to mention a thousand other scientific blogs) have been raising this issue for OVER A YEAR now. Sorely regrettable are (at the very least) the following cases:
* The full re-evaluation paper of "Toni" the baby sauropod as a brachiosaur (its brachiosaur identity was already known in paleo-circles since 2010), which was recently published in Wiley: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10…
* The "reappraisal" of Argyrosaurus specimens and the rediscription of one of them as a separate genus in JVP, the flagship journal of the Society of vertebrate Paleontology which was shamefully privatized on a silver platter to Taylor & Francis: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10… While I love the old JVP, the newer post-privatization issues raise a fundamental question: is it in any way economically reasonable, never mind fair, to make a nonprofit society journal the property of a private for-profit corporation in exchange for simply getting a discount for members? Does it make sense to just give away JVP, after everything it once was, to a company 2.bp.blogspot.com/-bSOIa7oHoNY… whose business practices are the very ANTITHESIS of free exchange of scientific knowledge?
Other news:
A new version of my Futalognkosaurus skeletal is completed, with new data from photos that have turned up recently. It turns out the hips were dead wrong in the previous versions, and the sacral spines were a good deal taller than I thought before.
Also I have renovated my Giraffatitan, and a Sauroposeidon skeletal is in the works (lucky you, Paleo King, only four bones! - but they tell a lot about the proportions of the animal, which were far more extreme than those of Giraffatitan). Also the juvenile OMNH specimen discovered by Ostrom decades ago will be illustrated for the first time. I will be working on a number of other projects, including Paralititan.
Because of unsustainable subscription prices and conditions, the board of directors of the mathematics department has voted to cancel all of its subscriptions to Elsevier journals by 2013. svpow.com/2012/05/04/they-said…
To quote Dr. Mike Taylor of SV-POW:
Publishers who are paying attention will surely start to realise that they have pushed their exploitative prices too far, and that they don't hold libraries in a steely grip any more. I wonder how this will play into investment advice regarding Elsevier?
This isn't the kind of problem that can be fixed by hiring a PR person. I've argued this before, but if Elsevier are going to survive, they'll need to be much clearer in the their communications, eliminate practices that alienate authors, and ultimately change their business model entirely.
This is good news indeed, but it can't come soon enough. Some of the newest sauropod papers just published are (unwisely) STILL being submitted by their authors in paywalled journals of Elsevier's ilk, such as Taylor & Francis, and Wiley. One wonders how many academics are truly paying attention to the long-overdue changing times, after SV-POW (not to mention a thousand other scientific blogs) have been raising this issue for OVER A YEAR now. Sorely regrettable are (at the very least) the following cases:
* The full re-evaluation paper of "Toni" the baby sauropod as a brachiosaur (its brachiosaur identity was already known in paleo-circles since 2010), which was recently published in Wiley: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10…
* The "reappraisal" of Argyrosaurus specimens and the rediscription of one of them as a separate genus in JVP, the flagship journal of the Society of vertebrate Paleontology which was shamefully privatized on a silver platter to Taylor & Francis: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10… While I love the old JVP, the newer post-privatization issues raise a fundamental question: is it in any way economically reasonable, never mind fair, to make a nonprofit society journal the property of a private for-profit corporation in exchange for simply getting a discount for members? Does it make sense to just give away JVP, after everything it once was, to a company 2.bp.blogspot.com/-bSOIa7oHoNY… whose business practices are the very ANTITHESIS of free exchange of scientific knowledge?
Other news:
A new version of my Futalognkosaurus skeletal is completed, with new data from photos that have turned up recently. It turns out the hips were dead wrong in the previous versions, and the sacral spines were a good deal taller than I thought before.
Also I have renovated my Giraffatitan, and a Sauroposeidon skeletal is in the works (lucky you, Paleo King, only four bones! - but they tell a lot about the proportions of the animal, which were far more extreme than those of Giraffatitan). Also the juvenile OMNH specimen discovered by Ostrom decades ago will be illustrated for the first time. I will be working on a number of other projects, including Paralititan.
The Egyptian Keystone: Mansourasaurus shahinae!
Recently we have this new species of titanosaur from Egypt which helps fill in some HUGE gaps.
Egypt is of course famous for much mythology and lore surrounding the raising of obelisks and pyramid keystones or capstones. Now we can add to that list, the "holy grail" or "keystone" of titanosaur evolution - Mansourasaurus shahinae.
Mansourasaurus shahinae is not all that large by titanosaur standards (the published skeletals shows it at about 8.5m, but I suspect that the neck was a good bit longer than they illustrated, as well as having more than the mere 13 vertebrae drawn here, so more like a total length of 10.5 or 11m at least), but enou
Regarding References
Just a happy jolly reminder to all who come here, please ask before using my work as reference for your work. If I know about it ahead of time, I'm usually okay with it. If you want references, respect the artist. If I see the opposite continuing to happen, I can simply stop posting skeletals here or make them purely pay-to-play (already get contracts so I don't need DA prints revenue, if this whole site died it wouldn't hurt me). Your choice peeps.
Another note; if you need a scale figure, please create your own human silhouette and scale bar. Don't copy mine. It's not that hard.
Argentinosaurus may actually still be the biggest.
I'd been meaning to get around to this for a while...
We all know Argentinosaurus is woefully incomplete. But for the first time we can get a mostly solid ides of what it looked like. For a long time, most Argentinosaurus reconstructions had been either purely speculative (i.e. Greg Paul - though he wasn't too far off the mark given the data available in the 1990s) or based on "cloning" the body of a distant relative (Ken Carpenter most notoriously used Saltasaurus, which as a low-grazing dwarf species, is among the worst models for restoring any fragmentary titanosaur over 20m).
More recently some speculative skeletals have cloned Malawisa
The Chubut Monster is now described and named!
Today the Chubut Monster, possibly the largest dinosaur known, has been published.
There are apparently six specimens from the same site. The largest of them may have exceeded 120 feet in length, and though the paper proposed a maximum mass of 82 tons, I suspect that when restored with the correct rib curvature and soft tissue levels, this animal may have exceeded 115 tons.
The AMNH mount, which is entirely made of fiberglass replicas, appears to be based on the holotype and a few similar-sized specimens. These are still smaller than the individual represented by the gigantic femur on the forklift pallets, which is a bit more eroded than
© 2012 - 2024 Paleo-King
Comments10
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Will the Sauroposeidon skeletal take into account new data suggesting that a) it's likely not a brachiosaurid and b) "Paluxysaurus" is synonymous?